Wielbark culture Y-DNA
Incomplete list of haplogroups from the Wielbark culture
Kowalewko
Kow_22 PCA0027 ~ 80-110/120 AD M CTS35 G2a2b2a1a1b1a1a2 https://www.yfull.com/tree/G-Z726/
Kow_24 PCA0029 ~ 10-375 AD unknown I1 or female*
Kow_25 PCA0030 ~ 110/120-160 AD F
Kow_26 PCA0031 ~ 10-375 AD F
Kow_29 PCA0034 ~ 80-260 AD F
Kow_31 PCA0036 ~ 80-260 AD M FGC8303 G2a2b2a1a1b1a1a2a1b1 https://www.yfull.com/tree/G-Y3101/
Kow_35 PCA0040 ~ 80-260 AD M CTS12891 G2a2b2a1, conflicting downstream mutations https://www.yfull.com/tree/G-CTS796/
Kow_41 PCA0046 ~ 110/120-160 AD M S12223 I1a3a1a2a1a~ https://www.yfull.com/tree/I-S11991/
Kow_48 PCA0053 ~ 80-260 AD F
Kow_54 PCA0059 ~ 110/120-160 AD F
Kow_57 PCA0062 ~ 80-260 AD M PF3331 G2a2b2a1 https://www.yfull.com/tree/G-CTS796/
Masłomęcz
Mas_1 PCA0088 211AD-383AD M low chrX and chrY coverage CTS8868 N1a1a1a1a1a https://www.yfull.com/tree/N-VL29/
Mas_23 PCA0110 124AD-257AD M M CTS6229,CTS3287,CTS12527 E1b1b1a1b1 https://www.yfull.com/tree/E-V13/
Mas_26 PCA0113 ~ 200AD-400AD - low chrX and chrY coverage SK1406 J2b2a~ https://www.yfull.com/tree/J-M241/
Mas_23 PCA0110 124AD-257AD M M CTS6229,CTS3287,CTS12527 E1b1b1a1b1 https://www.yfull.com/tree/E-V13/
Mas_26 PCA0113 ~ 200AD-400AD - low chrX and chrY coverage SK1406 J2b2a~ https://www.yfull.com/tree/J-M241/
Comments
Pamiętajmy też, że mamy w zapowiedziach jeszcze dwie próbki Z280+ z Masłomęcza.
Sure!
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/mjv4y7zaloy1zfs/AAArJ631EQvFnL5exiSk1R_La?dl=0
Myslím, že bude lepšie, ak budeme písať v angličtine.
Only 1500 SNPs from this sample overlap with K36 dataset, so running any analysis is tricky to say the least. But I'll be surprised if it's not Baltic as the similarity peaks in Latvia as you can see here.
Hello in any which file found this result and thanks
Hi. Which result you have in mind exactly?
Incomplete list of haplogroups from the Wielbark culture
Kowalewko
Kow_22 PCA0027 ~ 80-110/120 AD M CTS35 G2a2b2a1a1b1a1a2 https://www.yfull.com/tree/G-Z726/
Kow_24 PCA0029 ~ 10-375 AD unknown I1 or female*
Kow_25 PCA0030 ~ 110/120-160 AD F
Kow_26 PCA0031 ~ 10-375 AD F
Kow_29 PCA0034 ~ 80-260 AD F
Kow_31 PCA0036 ~ 80-260 AD M FGC8303 G2a2b2a1a1b1a1a2a1b1 https://www.yfull.com/tree/G-Y3101/
Kow_35 PCA0040 ~ 80-260 AD M CTS12891 G2a2b2a1, conflicting downstream mutations https://www.yfull.com/tree/G-CTS796/
Kow_41 PCA0046 ~ 110/120-160 AD M S12223 I1a3a1a2a1a~ https://www.yfull.com/tree/I-S11991/
Kow_48 PCA0053 ~ 80-260 AD F
Kow_54 PCA0059 ~ 110/120-160 AD F
Kow_57 PCA0062 ~ 80-260 AD M PF3331 G2a2b2a1 https://www.yfull.com/tree/G-CTS796/
Masłomęcz
Mas_1 PCA0088 211AD-383AD M low chrX and chrY coverage CTS8868 N1a1a1a1a1a https://www.yfull.com/tree/N-VL29/
Mas_23 PCA0110 124AD-257AD M M CTS6229,CTS3287,CTS12527 E1b1b1a1b1 https://www.yfull.com/tree/E-V13/
Mas_26 PCA0113 ~ 200AD-400AD - low chrX and chrY coverage SK1406 J2b2a~ https://www.yfull.com/tree/J-M241/
It is worth recalling what the researcher of its genetics, Ireneusz Stolarek, says about the Masłomęcz population:
"Genetic diversity of Mas-VBIA was a result of two demographic events:
1) Migration of Goths east of Vistula and admixture with local populations,
2) Migration of the admixed populations towards Black Sea, admixture with the local steppe populations and back migration of the Chernyakhov people to the Maslomecz".
We now know that this local population had Baltic haplogroups (N and Z280) and Baltic SNPs. In terms of mtDNA, the entire population of Masłomęcz generally groups with the Eastern Slavs. So if in the early Middle Ages we find outliners somewhere in the west genetically similar to Eastern Slavs or Balts, they are more likely to come from eastern Poland than from the middle Dnieper.
I don't think that I understand what you are trying to say and I have no idea what you're asking for.
If you're asking for the source files they're located here (fastq):
ftp://parrot.genomics.cn/gigadb/pub/10.5524/100001_101000/100310/Raw_data/
"Deep sequencing" files from Kowalewko are located here:
ftp://parrot.genomics.cn/gigadb/pub/10.5524/100001_101000/100310/Metaphlan2_Deep/
These are bams aligned to microbial genomes, so you need to realign them to the hg19 reference first.
IMHO you should focus on a completely different aspect and start asking about the subclades of N characteristic to Proto-Slavs.
If there was Y-DNA N with apparently Baltic autosomal profile in SE Poland, certainly it was present also in Belarus or NE Ukraine at that time.
Moreover there is no Uralic admixture among the Early Slavs. Just like there is no R1a-Z93 or whatever Asiatic admixture Scythians from Järve et al. had.
BTW I meant NW Ukraine of course (Maslomecz is ~100 km south of Belarus).
Don't forget that Ukrainians or Carpathian Rusyns are East Slavs too. Depending on the used dataset they can be more "western" than Poles.
Mixing with Balts and Uralics certainly had impact on a lot of East Slavs, but it didn't create this division.
what other process created the East Slavs?
IMHO Slavs were divided well before the Early Medieval migrations. Distribution of I2-Din is a key here.
I have your I1a-Din map. I hope it will be the subject of one of your next posts on this blog.
Mas_1 PCA0088 211AD-383AD Wielbark 200AD-400AD
VK579 Sweden Oland IronAge 200-400 CE N1a1a1a1a H1s
Target: VK2020_SWE_Oland_IA:VK579
Distance: 1.9591% / 0.01959063
23.4 Danish
22.6 Irish
15.6 Finnish
13.4 Lithuanian_SZ
12.8 Swedish
7.8 Icelandic
1.8 Luhya_Kenya
1.2 Karelian
1.0 Mbuti
0.2 Dutch
0.2 Karitiana
Moreover I don't think that this sample (VK579) is present in this analysis as it's missing from the S6 Table (Ancestry estimates).
Seeing Poles even in the Uralic-admixed Scandinavians is not helpful at all. Calling every possible sample a Pole or a Slav is as meaningless as calling every post-CWC sample "strongly Germanic".
"I meant NE Poles, Belarusians, N Ukrainians and European Russians (except for N Russians) who lie between the Balts and Poles and who do not differ genetically between each other."
N Ukrainians and Voronezh Russians are different from the others here.
According to G25 they have a southern shift towards the Moldovan Scythians (Dacians).
Carpathian Ukrainians have significant modern Romanian and Hungarian admixture on the other hand.
Try the Oland model with Kashubs (there are some in the G25). Look at the map; Kashubs will be a better proxy than the Danes, Finns and Lithuanians. The Kashubs have a lot eastern Baltic origin.
You've completely misinterpreted this map. It doesn't show any kinship with N Poland. What it shows is that the sample from Oland is almost completely "Swedish", sample from S Norway doesn't have any "Swedish" ancestry, and the other two are intermediate. It also shows the interpolated gradient of possible distribution of this "Swedish" component in Scandinavia. That's all.
Third panel shows the amount of the "Swedish-like" ancestry and possible gradient of it between the four plotted Iron Age samples. It has nothing to do with Northern Poland. What you see is just an artefact.
But I don't have coordinates of this sample as it's not in the official spreadsheet.
Uralic artefacts in a nearby Wielbark cemetery:
https://youtu.be/plCYJa3AIXc?t=10777
how can I get a BAM/CRAM file, for a sample (~110/120-160 AD M S12223 I1a3a1a2a1a~ https://www.yfull.com/live/tree/I-S11991/ ) "Kow_41 / PCA0046 (PC46) / SRS1815358 / SAMN06046935 / TaxonomicID: 447426"; I would like to send it to the yFull team. I am very interested as my haplogroup is under I-S11991!
I-Y250574 < I-Y39738 < I-Y42065 < I-S11991 / I-S12223 < I-Y6228 < I-Y3979 < I-S10360 ; my id in yFull is id:YF083833 and of my father is id:YF110052.
Yours sincerely, Jan Roman Sas Cisowski.
you should download the fastq file and align it to the human reference genome using BWA-aln. But it's doubtful that this sample would be in any way useful to Yfull as its quality is ultra low. We need to wait for high quality genomes.