Ancient DNA from the Wielbark culture - K36 results

-

Workflow:

merged fastq files -> bwa-aln -> mpileup -> pileupCaller -> DIYDodecad


Archaeological siteIDSample no.Sample no. that passed selectionDating
KowalewkoKO5848 (11 deep seq.)
100–300 AD
MasłomęczMZ2724200–400 AD


Ancient DNA from the Wielbark culture (Kowalewko, deep seq., selected samples) - Eurogenes K36 similarity map

Ancient DNA from the Wielbark culture (Kowalewko, shallow seq., all samples) - Eurogenes K36 similarity map

Ancient DNA from the Wielbark culture (Masłomęcz, shallow seq., all samples) - Eurogenes K36 similarity map

 

Comments

ambron said…
Wygląda na to, że w Masłomęczu jest znacznie więcej domieszki słowiańskiej (dryfu bałtosłowiańskiego) niż w Kowalewku. Ciekawie byłoby zobaczyć na PCA poszczególne próbki, tak jak już to widzieliśmy w przypadku Kowalewka. W Kowalewku kobieta Kow29 była zasadniczo Słowianką. W Masłomęczu niektóre genomy są pewnie jeszcze bardziej słowiańskie.
30 April 2021 at 06:02
ambron said…
It is worth looking at the ph2ter's PCA in this context:

https://anthrogenica.com/showthread.php?23595-New-Samples-from-Migration-Era-and-Early-Medieval-Moravia&p=768440&viewfull=1#post768440

Kow8, 10 and 6 are essentially Slavic.
1 May 2021 at 07:09
Arza said…
@ ambron

You need to be more careful with such statements. Usually PCAs have more than 2 dimensions.

I wouldn't dare to say that they're essentially Slavic. But at the same time I'm not convinced about their "Scandinavianess". In WE PCA they tend to be closest to CWC N47 and N49. We need to wait for better sequences to sort this out.
1 May 2021 at 10:57
ambron said…
Arza, as we know, N47 and N49 have a lot of Balto-Slavic drift, and the N47 in K36 is most similar to today's Kashubians (82%). So we can see the genetic continuity of Kuyavia, about which Lorkiewicz spoke.
1 May 2021 at 15:45
Post a Comment